Free Web Hosting by Netfirms
Web Hosting by Netfirms | Free Domain Names by Netfirms

 

 

Patient Satisfaction Survey

Home Up Patient Satisfaction Tuberculosis My Project Proposal My GMP

SECTION 1
Background
Methods
Results

SECTION 2
Between Subject Factors
Descriptive Statistics
Tests of Between Subject Effects
 

SATISFACTION PROFILE PLOTS
No Wait
After 15 Min Wait
After 16-30 Min Wait
After 31-45 Min Wait
After 46-60 Min Wait
After > 60 Min Wait
 

 

SECTION 4

Title 3
Title 4
Title 5

Title 6

SECTION 1

Background

     This page presents and compares satisfaction results for the Family Practice Clinic for three DoD services- Army, Air Force, and Navy.  It uses an existing data set found here. 

Methods

     Descriptive Statistics were calculated and a univarite linear model was used to compute mean responses as a function of both Waiting Time (time spent waiting for provider) and Time Spent with Provider.

Results

     The results of the statistical analysis are discussed below.

Univariate Analysis of Variance

Notes
Output Created 20-MAY-2002 14:52:07
Comments
Input Data C:\Documents and Settings\hillmerc\Desktop\Baylor Briefcase\4th Quarter\HAIN 5392\mpsrgx.sav
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 1137
Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are treated as missing.
Cases Used Statistics are based on all cases with valid data for all variables in the model.
Syntax UNIANOVA
q12 BY q8 q3g mservice
/METHOD = SSTYPE(3)
/INTERCEPT = INCLUDE
/PLOT = PROFILE( q3g*mservice*q8 )
/PRINT = DESCRIPTIVE ETASQ
/CRITERIA = ALPHA(.05)
/DESIGN = q8 q3g mservice q8*q3g q8*mservice q3g*mservice q8*q3g*mservice .
Resources Elapsed Time 0:00:02.03


SECTION 2

Between-Subjects Factors

Value Label N
HOW LONG WAIT FOR PROVIDER 1 DID NOT WAIT 196
2 1-15 MIN 496
3 16-30 MIN 231
4 31-45 MIN 72
5 46-60 MIN 32
6 >60 MIN 11
AMOUNT OF TIME WITH PROVIDER & STAFF 1 POOR 18
2 FAIR 73
3 GOOD 206
4 VERY GOOD 320
5 EXCELLENT 421
MSERVICE 1 ARMY 319
2 AIR FORCE 228
3 NAVY 491

     The table above provides a breakdown of the responses (n=1038) for the time spent waiting for the provider and a rating for the time spent with the provider and staff  in the Family Care Clinic in all military treatment facilities.  Of the responses provided, 319 were Army service members, 228 were Air Force, and 491 were Navy service members. 

Descriptive Statistics
Dependent Variable: SATISFIED W CLINIC DURING THIS VISIT
HOW LONG WAIT FOR PROVIDER AMOUNT OF TIME WITH PROVIDER & STAFF MSERVICE Mean Std. Deviation N
DID NOT WAIT POOR Navy 1.00 . 1
Total 1.00 . 1
FAIR Navy 5.33 .577 3
Army 5.00 .000 4
Air Force 4.50 2.121 2
Total 5.00 .866 9
GOOD Navy 5.83 .577 12
Army 5.67 .500 9
Air Force 5.25 1.500 4
Total 5.68 .748 25
VERY GOOD Navy 6.05 1.253 22
Army 5.85 1.226 20
Air Force 6.62 .506 13
Total 6.11 1.133 55
EXCELLENT Navy 6.62 1.105 52
Army 6.83 .381 24
Air Force 6.20 1.495 30
Total 6.55 1.139 106
Total Navy 6.27 1.252 90
Army 6.18 .984 57
Air Force 6.16 1.375 49
Total 6.21 1.209 196
1-15 MIN POOR Navy 4.00 . 1
Army 2.00 .000 3
Air Force 1.00 . 1
Total 2.20 1.095 5
FAIR Navy 5.33 1.225 9
Army 4.75 1.603 12
Air Force 5.50 .707 2
Total 5.04 1.397 23
GOOD Navy 5.61 .812 49
Army 5.69 1.011 26
Air Force 5.21 .976 19
Total 5.55 .911 94
VERY GOOD Navy 6.18 .556 77
Army 6.29 .617 48
Air Force 6.09 1.215 34
Total 6.19 .759 159
EXCELLENT Navy 6.58 .667 101
Army 6.52 1.280 66
Air Force 6.52 .967 48
Total 6.55 .955 215
Total Navy 6.19 .811 237
Army 6.08 1.319 155
Air Force 6.07 1.248 104
Total 6.13 1.087 496
16-30 MIN POOR Navy 4.50 2.121 2
Army 2.00 . 1
Air Force 5.00 .000 2
Total 4.20 1.643 5
FAIR Navy 4.40 1.454 15
Army 4.83 .983 6
Air Force 4.33 1.862 6
Total 4.48 1.424 27
GOOD Navy 5.79 .426 14
Army 5.65 .813 20
Air Force 4.92 1.656 13
Total 5.49 1.081 47
VERY GOOD Navy 5.94 .475 36
Army 5.81 1.096 26
Air Force 5.40 1.056 15
Total 5.79 .864 77
EXCELLENT Navy 5.79 1.689 39
Army 6.52 .602 21
Air Force 6.00 1.512 15
Total 6.04 1.447 75
Total Navy 5.62 1.320 106
Army 5.84 1.086 74
Air Force 5.31 1.503 51
Total 5.62 1.303 231
31-45 MIN POOR Navy 3.00 .000 3
Total 3.00 .000 3
FAIR Navy 4.33 .516 6
Army 5.33 .577 3
Air Force 4.00 .000 2
Total 4.55 .688 11
GOOD Navy 5.00 1.118 9
Army 5.33 1.211 6
Air Force 5.50 1.604 8
Total 5.26 1.287 23
VERY GOOD Navy 6.10 .876 10
Army 5.89 .333 9
Air Force 6.00 . 1
Total 6.00 .649 20
EXCELLENT Navy 6.43 .535 7
Army 4.67 3.215 3
Air Force 4.60 3.286 5
Total 5.47 2.356 15
Total Navy 5.31 1.301 35
Army 5.48 1.289 21
Air Force 5.06 2.112 16
Total 5.31 1.498 72
46-60 MIN FAIR Navy 4.50 .707 2
Army 5.00 . 1
Total 4.67 .577 3
GOOD Navy 5.33 1.633 6
Army 5.33 1.033 6
Air Force 4.67 .577 3
Total 5.20 1.207 15
VERY GOOD Navy 6.00 .000 2
Army 5.00 .000 2
Air Force 6.00 . 1
Total 5.60 .548 5
EXCELLENT Navy 5.75 .957 4
Army 7.00 . 1
Air Force 6.00 1.155 4
Total 6.00 1.000 9
Total Navy 5.43 1.222 14
Army 5.40 .966 10
Air Force 5.50 1.069 8
Total 5.44 1.076 32
>60 MIN POOR Navy 1.00 .000 3
Army 6.00 . 1
Total 2.25 2.500 4
GOOD Navy 6.00 .000 2
Total 6.00 .000 2
VERY GOOD Navy 5.33 .577 3
Army 6.00 . 1
Total 5.50 .577 4
EXCELLENT Navy 7.00 . 1
Total 7.00 . 1
Total Navy 4.22 2.489 9
Army 6.00 .000 2
Total 4.55 2.339 11
Total POOR Navy 2.60 1.647 10
Army 2.80 1.789 5
Air Force 3.67 2.309 3
Total 2.83 1.724 18
FAIR Navy 4.71 1.226 35
Army 4.88 1.177 26
Air Force 4.50 1.508 12
Total 4.74 1.248 73
GOOD Navy 5.60 .852 92
Army 5.61 .904 67
Air Force 5.15 1.302 47
Total 5.50 1.001 206
VERY GOOD Navy 6.08 .710 150
Army 6.03 .899 106
Air Force 6.03 1.112 64
Total 6.05 .864 320
EXCELLENT Navy 6.42 1.091 204
Army 6.54 1.149 115
Air Force 6.24 1.429 102
Total 6.41 1.199 421
Total Navy 5.96 1.181 491
Army 5.98 1.208 319
Air Force 5.83 1.446 228
Total 5.94 1.252 1038


Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
Dependent Variable: SATISFIED W CLINIC DURING THIS VISIT
Source Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Partial Eta Squared
Corrected Model 569.212(a) 72 7.906 7.225 .000 .350
Intercept 3188.341 1 3188.341 2913.686 .000 .751
Q8= WAIT FOR PROVIDER 9.517 5 1.903 1.739 .123 .009
Q3G= TIME SPENT WITH PROVIDER 146.510 4 36.628 33.472 .000 .122
MILITARY SERVICE 3.423 2 1.712 1.564 .210 .003
Q8 * Q3G 39.207 18 2.178 1.991 .008 .036
Q8 * MILITARY SERVICE 19.122 9 2.125 1.942 .043 .018
Q3G * MILITARY SERVICE 10.804 8 1.351 1.234 .275 .010
Q8 * Q3G * MILITARY SERVICE 58.410 26 2.247 2.053 .002 .052
Error 1055.964 965 1.094


Total 38241.000 1038



Corrected Total 1625.176 1037



a R Squared = .350 (Adjusted R Squared = .302)


     The above data indicates that for patient satisfaction, there is statistical significance for the amount of time spent with the provider,  but not for how long the patient had to wait for the provider.

Profile Plots

AMOUNT OF TIME WITH PROVIDER & STAFF * MSERVICE * HOW LONG WAIT FOR PROVIDER

How long wait for provider = did not wait

     This chart indicates that average mean response for patient satisfaction are generally the same across the services for those who did not have to wait to see their provider.   It also indicates that as their rating for the time spent with staff increased, so did their overall satisfaction with the clinic.  From the descriptive statistics above, over 80% of respondents in this category rated the time spent with provider either very good or excellent

How long wait for provider = 1-15 min

     This chart also displays a similar trend in satisfaction.  Over 75% of respondents rated their satisfaction in the top two categories.  Their is large range in the estimated marginal means for the poor rating do to a very small sample size. (n=5).

How long wait for provider = 16-30 min

     The vast majority of respondents experienced a wait time of less than 30 minutes in the Primary Care Clinic.  From the descriptive statistics, over 70% of respondents (n=1038) experienced a wait time of 30 minutes or less.

How long wait for provider = 31-45 min


How long wait for provider = 46-60 min


How long wait for provider = >60 min

     It is important to note that for this category, the Air Force had no respondents who had to wait over 60 minutes to see their provider.